🫁
Rad-Intel
Clinical AI
Hybrid: 92.0% Acc (AUC 0.974)

1Chest Radiograph

Upload a frontal Chest X-Ray (CXR) for automated pneumonia screening.

Drag & drop radiograph, or browse
Supports JPEG, PNG (DICOM converted) β€’ Max 20MB
Selected CXR Preview
Quick Test with Benchmark CXRs
Kept in this server's audit log. Use a reference, not a name or a hospital number.
The list is filled in from the server, so a version released from clinician-reviewed cases appears here with the scores it was measured at.

2Assessment

🩺
Awaiting Radiograph

Upload or select a sample Chest X-Ray on the left and click "Analyze Radiograph" to generate the diagnostic assessment and clinical report.

Analyzing Radiograph
Preprocessing image with CLAHE...
⚠️
PNEUMONIA DETECTED
Calibrated decision threshold applied
94.2% Confidence
Normal: 5.8% Pneumonia: 94.2%
Original Radiograph
Preprocessed Chest X-Ray
Grad-CAM Saliency Heatmap
Grad-CAM Opacity Localization
Anatomical Localization & Opacity Patterns
Focal consolidations dominant in the right lower lung field / retrocardiac & basal zone.
πŸ“‹ Clinical Radiology Report
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
-
-
-
*Notice: Rad-Intel is restricted to technical research and education. It does not provide diagnosis, treatment, triage or autonomous decision support, and its output is not a radiological finding. Any clinical question must be referred to a physician.*

Ask about lungs and pneumonia

General educational questions only. This is separate from the classifier and never sees your radiograph.

Educational information only; not medical diagnosis. Seek qualified medical care for urgent or personal concerns.

Try asking:

Closed study Β· by invitation

Clinician review workspace

A small group of named clinicians review cases against one shared model and correct it where it is wrong. Access is issued by hand. There is no sign-up.

Anything that needs sorting out β€” a lost Rad-Intel ID, a changed phone number, a case uploaded by mistake, a question about how your data is used β€” goes to the study administrator personally, using the contact details you were given when your account was issued.

Log in

Your email address and the Rad-Intel ID the administrator gave you. A one-time code is then emailed to you.

Issued to you personally. Starts with RAD.
no account?

What this system is

Rad-Intel classifies paediatric chest radiographs as normal or pneumonia, shows which regions drove the score, and writes a structured summary from those recorded outputs. Classification, explanation and language generation are kept separate so that every displayed sentence traces back to a number the model produced.

Restricted to technical research and education. It does not provide diagnosis, treatment, triage or autonomous decision support, and it is not a medical device.

Measured results

Held-out 624-image test partition, single run at seed 42.

93.4%
Best accuracy
0.977
Best AUROC
624
Test images
5
Configurations
ConfigurationAcc.AUROCSens.Spec.
DenseNet12191.5%0.96295.6%84.6%
Swin-T90.1%0.97597.4%77.8%
ResNet5089.7%0.95493.3%83.8%
Fusion without CBAM93.4%0.97794.6%91.4%
Complete classifier92.0%0.97495.9%85.5%

Known limitations

  • Paediatric images from a single institution; nothing extends to other ages, institutions or acquisition protocols without external validation.
  • Labels collapse bacterial and viral pneumonia into one class.
  • No dependable patient identifier, so the split cannot guarantee patient-level independence.
  • Each configuration was trained once, so no result separates an architectural effect from seed variation.
  • Between 21% and 48% of model response falls outside the segmented lung fields, consistent with shortcut learning on this dataset.
  • Grad-CAM and LIME agree only weakly with each other; a heatmap shows model sensitivity, not pathology.
  • Generated summaries read as diagnostic to a reviewing clinician in half of sampled cases despite passing schema validation.

Which model you are using

The table above describes the five configurations trained for this project, measured on the held-out partition named there.

The chooser offers what this server actually holds. The table above is the record of what was trained for the project; a configuration whose weights were not put on this server is simply not listed, so you may see fewer than five. The model chooser may also offer versions released by the study administrator from radiographs contributed by participating clinicians after these results were measured. One kind is this project's own checkpoint fine-tuned on a batch of reviews; the other, named community_hybrid, is the same fusion architecture retrained from scratch on the public dataset together with every contributed case. Both are scored on the same held-out partition and their numbers are shown beside their names, but the table above does not describe them β€” it describes the five configurations only. The default is unchanged: the complete classifier, and a released model is only ever something a visitor picks deliberately.
Copied to clipboard